Buying wickets - a lost art?
Is buying wickets a skill that's dying out of the game? It certainly feels like that to me. Years ago the standard club cricket game was to get 250+ and declare, and then toss the ball up to ensure that a result was inevitable, taking wickets as the batting side pushed for victory. Time and time again, we won fielding second with the opposition 10 or 20 short.
These days I'm not sure a young player would know the term "buying wickets". I don't think it's about denying the opposition batting points - it's more about not risking a loss. How disappointing! For me declaration cricket is all about the tactics required to force a result but somehow that seems to be a declining part of the game.
There is a reason I've turned to this topic - our game yesterday! We won the toss and fielded, which of course means that you can't complain when the opposition doesn't let you into the game. But their tactics made a draw inevitable. Didn't they want to win? Having been in a decent position we lost 2 wickets in a few balls and two of us were at the crease on 0. One hit over the top and suddenly I was faced with deep square, deep mid-wicket, long on and long off. Not surprisingly the rate went up and up, but the field remained the same even with 10 an over needed.
It made a draw inevitable, and all we could do was play for the bonus point that came with 160, 180 and 200. But for our opposition Billingshurst it meant they had little chance of winning, even bringing back their opening medium pace bowler, rather than bowl spin from both ends. They took a wicket in the final over as we pushed for 180, but the game was over as a spectacle with 15 overs to go. They could have won the game had they been willing to risk losing it - hopefully they'll continue those tactics throughout the season when they're playing everyone else too!![]()


















