Deccan will hope surnames beginning with S win the day
Random spot - clearly Deccan believe in the power of players with surnames beginning with the letter S, seeing as the majority of their team for the IPL semi-final fit that description.
"burble" - verb. To talk at great length, with scant regard for logic or facts and with no attempt to reach a conclusion.
Random spot - clearly Deccan believe in the power of players with surnames beginning with the letter S, seeing as the majority of their team for the IPL semi-final fit that description.
Posted by
Ed
at
15:28
1 comments
Poor old Michelle got taken round various Hampshire pubs on Sunday - most of them with a cricketing theme! Perhaps Cricket Burble can start to feature pubs with a cricketing theme in future....in between the superbly insightful cricketing comments! Here's a few photos...
The Bush Inn, Ovington - no cricketing theme - just nice!
On the wall at The Cricketers
Outside the Thomas Lord in West Meon (sounds like outer space!) with Allan
Broadhalfpenny Down were Broadhalfpenny Brigands CC play
Beautiful setting it is too...
The sign outside the Bat and Ball in Hambledon
Allan outside the pub
Me next to the Hambledon Cricket Club monument.
Posted by
Ed
at
07:54
1 comments
I'm a fan of the Freakonomics books and their latest piece of Freakonomics analysis assesses the impact of getting the right first job on your future career prospects by looking at how player's faired on Test cricket debut and whether they played home or away....
I did consider commenting about how much luck there is involved in poor umpiring decisions or dropped catches etc, but decided to leave the brakes on that particular bandwaggon this time!
Posted by
Ed
at
06:32
0
comments
We had our first friendly on Saturday in which we lost by, erm, loads and I couldn't have performed much worse! They had a guy who averaged over 100 last year and I dropped him on 20ish at 2nd slip. It was only just a drop as well as it flew and I just got my fingers to it before it hit me in the mouth! Shortly afterwards another edge went between 1st and 2nd slip as we looked at each other and with the keeper starting to go for it and then leaving it.
Not content with that, I then missed the keeper with a throw from half way out to the boundary by the length of the wicket and bowled 6 overs for 50 (my nemesis being the guy I dropped). There was a wicket in there but I'm pretty sure he didn't edge it behind so I'm not sure that counts! Let's hope things get better from here....
How many did their main batsman get? He retired after 30 overs on 170p not out, so my drop might best be described as "very costly"!
Posted by
Ed
at
06:20
0
comments
It sounds like one of those bizarre questions you might get at an Oxbridge interview: how can you despatch a letter 50 miles in one hour? Oh, and you are Lord March, the last Duke of Queensberry, later known as Old Q (his rapping name perhaps) and the year is somewhere around 1750. No Postman Pat little red van to help.
Lord March was an incredibly successful gambler, principally on the newly fashionable horse races at Newmarket. His talent lay in his scientific approach to horse racing and his creativity - sometimes manifesting as ingenious solutions to problems like the one above but more often as cheating. I read about him in 'Can we have our balls back, please?' by Julian Norridge, a great book about how the British gave sport to the world and let the world beat them at it. To quote from the book, 'throughout [March]'s life he is said to have won nearly a quarter of a million pounds. He had his best year at Newmarket when he was 63 and then retired to his house in Piccadilly to devote himself to his other great passion, the lusts of the flesh.'
So how did he win this bet? He enclosed the letter in a cricket ball, hired 24 of the best fielders of the time, stood them in a circle and instructed them to throw the ball around. The solution is extremely neat, but those fielders must have been bloody good: 50 miles in one hour equates to 1467 yards per minute and if the fielders stood fifty yards apart, they'd have to have completed their catch and throw (reaching the next fielder) in about two seconds. Seventy yards apart and they'd have around three seconds.
The more I think about it, the less plausible it seems, but why let that get in the way of a good story? It reminds me of another bet I heard of: A bets B he can throw a cricket ball 30 yards, make it stop and come back to him. B accepts the bet and watch A throw the ball 30 yards vertically into the air and catch it. D'oh.
Posted by
John Wright
at
15:03
0
comments
Not everyone is a fan of the F word being printed in full - especially not in Wisden - particularly Max Davidson of The Telegraph it seems. I expect Wisden will be thankful for the exposure....
Posted by
Ed
at
08:32
0
comments
It seems that Brian Lara might be about to sign for Surrey for Twenty20 which is an interesting move. There's no doubt he was a great batsman, as this Lara video shows on the BBC site (although the right-handed shot is an editing error - he didn't also bat right handed!), but will he come good at the Oval? Well it may not matter - I bet the marketing men there have worked out that those of West Indian extraction around Kensington will instantly be engaged by this signing.
Whether he'll be successful is open to question and I would argue he'll struggle to ever play ahead of an athlete and true all-rounder like Andrew Symonds. But he might just still have it, and his penchant for going arial could work on what last season were some pretty small boundaries when they brought the ropes right in for Twenty20 (but where would he field?). Either way, Surrey will see it as a risk worth taking....
Posted by
Ed
at
08:21
0
comments
Blimey, this innings by Arun Harinath for Surrey looks like a sleep inducing one - 62 off 290 balls!
Posted by
Ed
at
18:20
1 comments
Our Steyning rep at the Sussex League meeting on Tuesday reported various updates, but one in particular caught my eye:
"There has been a change on the laws on the younger junior age groups playing in open age cricket (adult cricket). Basically, no U12's in adult cricket, U13's only if they have been signed off by a level 2 coach and have written parental consent. It was stressed at the meeting that all of the above directives and guidelines apply to all Sussex League games."
Why would anyone come up with that law? It must be the same people who came up with the fact that under 18s mustn't change at the same time as over 18s meaning that, in theory, 2 of last year's Steyning 1st team should have been treated as outsiders and told to change seperately!
Sachin Tendulkar was playing Test cricket at 16 and I've been told (can't verify this - sorry!) that Eoin Morgan scored a hundred in the Middlesex Premier League age 16, so I can't imagine a low-level club game at 11 would have phased them. And at the other end of the skill spectrum, even I was bowling in the OMT 3rd XI aged 11! I would argue that all players need to be stretched to reach maximum performance, so why anyone needs to create this law is beyond me!
Posted by
Ed
at
08:23
1 comments
Sussex seem to have got into a bit of hot water for killing a fox that persistently damaged the ground at Hove - apparently all of 20 protesters gathered on Tuesday to demonstrate which gives you an idea of the scale of outrage!
Sussex probably have more to worry about given that one end of their ground is a building site at the moment....
Posted by
Ed
at
08:17
0
comments
Having read about Essex's amazing penultimate ball victory yesterday, I of course went straight to the ECB's site to check out the highlights. Day 3 was on there but no day 4 yet....a little way to go yet if they want to reawaken interest in the LV= County Championship.
Any ideas who LV= are anyway?!?
Posted by
Ed
at
08:04
2
comments
Whenever we think of stodgy they-shall-not-pass batting the list is usually headed by Englishmen - Boycott, Steele, Bailey and Tavare but Boycott once played a famous buccaneering innings in a one day final for Yorkshire and as though who saw him regularly in county cricket know Tavare was often similarly aggressive. His benefit year tie nicely showed his effacing manor - the motif was a tortoise playing a Caribbean shot. Anyway I see his nephew is opening the batting for Loughborough UCCE against Kent and I wonder which camp he will fall into.
Posted by
Mark Davis
at
16:37
1 comments
My sort of course - a cricket University course - probably just as well it wasn't available when I was 18!
Posted by
Ed
at
11:47
0
comments
Mountaineers v Mid West Rhinos conjours up all kinds of pictures but none of them to do with cricketers!
Posted by
Mark Davis
at
11:02
1 comments
A couple of thoughts:
1. Monty: I hope things pick up from here - what a start!
2. Matthew Hoggard: I'll be happy to be proved wrong as I'm a big fan of Paul Nixon's whole-hearted endeavour and desire to do whatever's best for the team, but batting a guy with a first class average of 34 at 3 as a specialist batsmen worries me!
So amazing seasons coming up for Nixon and Panesar then....
Posted by
Ed
at
19:09
0
comments
Great weather for the first proper day of the summer (given that the MCC v Durham game was played in an empty stadium in Dubai) - fingers crossed that remains the case for most of the season!
This Guardian article makes interesting reading entitled "ECB's muddled thinking generates less with more", outlining how players are playing fewer competitions but more cricket now compared to 30 years ago. But what really caught my eye was the final paragraph:
"...those who value county cricket can now, for the first time, watch highlights of each match free online each day throughout the season on ECB and county websites."
Finally! I wondered when the ECB or the Counties would get round to that - surely something that every County cricket supporter has been wanting for years. Hopefully I'll get the time to watch...
Posted by
Ed
at
07:49
0
comments
Although I should of course go and watch Sussex now I live on the south coast, I can't help thinking that Andrew Symonds will be good to watch in Surrey colours, and the Oval just so happens to be the nearest ground to my office! Scoring a half century at a strike rate of 220 to help win the match in the IPL seems like good practice for the mostly second rate (in comparison) County bowling he'll face....
Those of you watching the IPL: was Pietersen not available for selection for Bangalore, or dropped?
Posted by
Ed
at
19:23
1 comments
I knew I'd spoken too soon....but Brendan McCullum is not a bad replacement for Sussex!
Posted by
Ed
at
17:05
0
comments
For those remotely interested in the long-running saga of Pakistani Shoaib Malik and whether he was or wasn't previously married, it seems he was. You'd have to feel a little concerned if you were his bride to be, Indian tennis player Sania Mirza, wouldn't you?
Posted by
Ed
at
08:00
0
comments
It seems the Australian Cricket Board have decided to publicise how much they pay their top players as part of a campaign to ensure that cricket is considered equally by young sportsmen with rugby and Aussie rules football. I can understand the reasoning, but I'm not sure that anything is being achieved that couldn't have been by simply saying that their pay is at least competitive with other sports.
Posted by
Ed
at
07:52
0
comments